Introduction
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 introduces specific provisions, notably under sections 197 and 353, to penalise the creation and spread of “Fake news” or “Misleading information” that threatens national sovereignty, security, or public order. Offenders are punished by three years in prison, fines or both. The rapid expansion of digital communication platforms has amplified the dissemination of misinformation and fake news, posing significant threats to public order, democratic institutions and individual reputation.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), which replaces the Indian Penal Code, 1860, retains and modifies some provisions aimed at regulating false and misleading information. This time, fake news and misinformation cases are increasing. Because some people do it for fun and make money, etc. BNS section 353 says that fake news and misleading information are primarily punished under 353, which replaces IPC section 505.
Conceptual understanding of “Fake news” “, Misleading”:
This time, fake news spreads like a plague; it is defined as untrue or unverified news. Fake news consists of stories, news, and hoaxes created to deliberately misinform or deceive readers or to push a political agenda.
Misinformation is incorrect or misleading information. Without a deliberate intent to cause harm. It is a more technical term for fake news and is something that can spread quickly across various platforms, such as social media channels.
Relevant provisions under BNS, 2023: Although BNS does not explicitly use the term fake news.
- False statement and public mischief: Provisions analogous to section 505 IPC are retained. Circulation of false statements, rumours or reports. Intent to cause fear, alarm or public disorder, incitement against communities or the state. If anyone violates this, then they are punished by three years’ imprisonment, a fine or both.
- Statements conducting to public mischief: It covers the dissemination of false information, likely to disturb public tranquillity, or incite communal hatred or violence.
- Defamation (false information harmful to reputation): Publishing false information about an individual May amount to. If anyone made defamation, then they were punished by imprisonment for up to 2 years or fine or both.
- Forgery and fabrication of electronic records: Creating fake documents, images or videos falsely under surgery-related provisions and punishment by imprisonment ranging from 2 to 7 years, depending on the gravity or a fine.
- Offences affecting sovereignty and security: Fake news that threatens national security, sovereignty, public safety and violates it is then punished by severe penalties, including long-term imprisonment, depending on the nature of the offence.
- Nature: This is a cognizable and non-bailable offence, often applied to digital misinformation that threatens public peace.
Intersection with other laws:
BNS provisions operate alongside other statutes.
Constitution of India: Article 19(1)(a) Freedom of speech within reasonable restrictions. Article 19(2).
Indian Penal Code:
- Section 153A: Penalises spreading information that promotes enmity, hatred, or ill-will between different groups based on religion, race, place of birth, or language.
- Section 295A: (outraging religious feelings): Punishes a deliberate and malicious act intended to insult religious beliefs through false information.
- Sections 499 & 500: Defamation covers the intentional spreading of false news that damages the reputation of an individual or organisation.
- Section 505(1) & (2): (Public Misconduct): Criminalises making or circulating false statements, rumours, or reports intended to cause fear, alarm, or induce people to commit offences against the public or state.
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Section 69A: It imposes an obligation on the intermediaries, such as search engines, to remove any objectionable content pursuant to takedown notices by law enforcement agencies.
Judicial approach:
The courts of India have emphasised the necessity to prove intention or likelihood of harm. Protection of legitimate free speech. The importance of context and impact in determining liability.
Amish Devgan v. Union of India 2021
Concerned about hate speech via broadcast media. The court clarified that speech that spreads false narratives targeting communities can be restricted. It falls under BNS sections 196 & 197. And Article 19(1)(a) it overrides group dignity or public order.
Bilal Ahmed Karoo v. State of Andhra Pradesh 1997
It concerned IPC section 505 (now BNS section 353). Mere careless or false statements are Sufficient. There must be intent or likelihood of public disorder. He was convicted of sedition under Section 124-A of the IPC, and he was sentenced to imprisonment for life, besides being convicted of certain other lesser offences for which a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years was awarded under each count.
Conclusion
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 addresses the menace of fake news indirectly through a network of provisions dealing with public mischief, definition, fraud and national security, through which these provisions provide a robust legal framework. Effective enforcement requires technological capacity. Clear guidelines and judicial oversight to maintain constitutional balance. The new event approach is essential to ensure that the law curbs harmful misinformation without undermining democratic freedom. Many people who spread fake news through social media, through television, through men to men connection and many roots in BNS section 353 are punishable by 3 years imprisonment or fine, or both and BNS section 353 is replaced by IPC 1860.
Share this Post
